Showing posts with label Delacroix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Delacroix. Show all posts

Saturday, August 27, 2022

Imperfection


In his journal on June 29, 1857, Eugene Delacroix copied this maxim from La Rochefoucauld: "There are beautiful things which have more brilliance when they remain imperfect than when they are too perfect." A view of Field Farm in Williamstown, MA from the North Trail. 6x8 inches, gouache on mixed media paper.

Wednesday, July 21, 2021

A Painting For The Moment


A painting for the moment: lush foliage and the threat of rain.  A view of Luce Road in Williamstown, MA near the farm, looking north.  Delacroix wrote, "What a strange thing painting is, pleasing us by its resemblance to objects which could not please us in themselves!"  9x12 inches, oil on linen panel.

Sunday, July 18, 2021

How To Do It


From the other day at Field Farm. 12x12 inches, oil on linen panel.  Delacroix wrote, "Constable said that the superiority of the green he uses for his meadows derives from the fact that it is composed of a multitude of different greens.  What causes the lack of intensity and life in verdure as it is painted by the common run of landscapists is that they ordinarily do it with a uniform tint.  What he said about the green of the meadows can be applied to all the other tones."

Monday, December 17, 2018

Painting Brooklyns and Delacroix


Painting can be an obsession.  Did you ever notice that painters paint … all the time?  Painting small Brooklyns is my latest painting obsession.  This is a view on Franklin Avenue towards Atlantic Avenue.  This is a busy intersection in terms of foot-traffic because there's a subway station across the street where you can get the train to Manhattan.  I took it recently to see the Delacroix show at the Met.  

Here's a quote from Delacroix's Journal for May 5, 1852 (Walter Pach translation):

"One should lay in one's picture so that it [h]as the look of representing the scene on a gray day, without sun, without clear-cut shadows.  Speaking radically, there are neither lights nor shades.  There is a color mass for each object, having different reflections on all sides.  Let us suppose that, in this scene, in the open air and under gray light, a ray from the sun suddenly illumines the objects: you will have lights and shades as they are understood, but they are pure accidents.  The deeper truth of this, singular as it may seem, contains the whole comprehension of color in painting.  How strange it is that this truth has been understood by only a very small number of great painters, even among those who are regarded as colorists."

If I understand this correctly (which I may not), I am reminded of the oft-heard phrase: paint shapes of color, not things.  The things, even "lights and shades,"  will take care of themselves. My French original identifies this passage as defining the "doctrine of impressionism."

6x8 oil on panel.  



Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Alas, Poor Yorick, after Delacroix

A high school class mate was kind enough to keep a painting that I did back then for an English assignment. I wanted to discard it at the time, but she asked for it and saved it all those years. I am grateful to her. She recently found my blog, and asked if I wanted the painting back. Of course, and now I am burdening you with it. What strikes me, beside my musings then, is that my paint handling, especially in the sky, is not that different from the pastel painting I did a couple days ago.

I will return to painting tomorrow.